Archive for the ‘Internet’ category

Is FriendFeed Dead Yet?

March 7th, 2010

dead.jpgSince FriendFeed was acquired by Facebook last summer, there has not only been a large exodus of users from the site, but also an increasing volume of pronouncements that FriendFeed, if not already dead yet, is in fact dying rapidly. The major outage last week sent TechCrunch into a near-orgasmic state of proclaiming that, not only was FriendFeed dead, but that no one cared.

As a matter of fact, people do care whether FriendFeed lives or dies, and it is to serve that community of brilliant, innovative individuals that I created the site, Is FriendFeed dead yet?. Using a patent-pending “death checker” algorithm, plus some math, I am able to determine with a high degree of certainty whether or not FriendFeed is still alive. Now, with this site, you do not even need to visit FriendFeed.com to determine if it’s dead yet—you can do this entirely from my site.

Let me know if you’d like to donate to support its continued development.

» Read more: Is FriendFeed Dead Yet?

Let me try that again

January 22nd, 2010

My people shop at WalmartThe response to my decision on Wednesday night to close my FriendFeed account has been, to say the least, rather interesting (and somewhat overwhelming). Responses have ranged from shock and outrage to anger to mere flippancy. Most people have been overwhelmingly kind and generous, and a few have said, in essence, that I need to grow a backbone and learn how to deal with it.

All these responses are probably valid, in some way or another, and I’m not going to try to argue against any of the charges made. But, in response to the statement, “this is all too abstract for me,” I’ll try to clarify the particular issue:

People behave far worse online than they ever would in person.

» Read more: Let me try that again

Goodbye, FriendFeed

January 20th, 2010

I have deleted my FriendFeed account. I’ve told myself that there was no reason I could ever do that—nothing anything could say or do that would so piss me off that I thought I would be better off without that circle of friends. And friends we are: we’ve consoled each other over the deaths of our mutual friends. We’ve shared births and weddings and new jobs and losing jobs and strange holidays that we’ve never heard of before. And yet, in spite of that, there are people there who take absolute joy in being a troll: in finding something personal that they can attack and ridicule. They like the attention, I suppose.

Texas Logo.jpgFriendFeed was like a comfortable pub. I could show up any time of the day or night and find people that I liked, who liked me, and who would have something interesting to discuss. Imagine visiting that pub for years, growing comfortable, watching new people come and old ones die or merely fade away. Imagine showing up one day to find that every person you knew had decided to humiliate you by attacking the things you hold most dear—your home. Imagine hearing them carry on and on about how awful a place it is, how stupid the people are there, and how they don’t really understand it, but they really hate that place.

Would you come back? Is that the sort of place where you want to find your friends? Guess what, my “friends?” I shop at Wal-mart. My family shops at Wal-mart. They mostly vote Republican. They worship Jesus Christ and don’t fully understand foreign cultures, though they’re open and friendly and loving, especially once you get to know them. They like country music and bass fishing and they don’t like pretentious assholes from other states telling them how they should spend their money. They read Reader’s Digest and Shakespeare and ancient Greek. Some of them drive Priuses and others drive big, gas-hogging SUVs because that’s what they need to pull their boat or simply to protect their loved ones in a crash.

I’m torn between two worlds, having grown up in the deepest parts of east Texas, and living now in Silicon Valley. I’ve also lived in Ascot, England, and worked in Wuppertal, Germany. Fundamentally, “my people” are not all that different than those of you who like to poke fun at them. One of the few differences is that they teach their children manners. When I visit Texas, the children there, with few exceptions, say “Yes, Sir,” and “No, Sir,” and “Hello, Mr. Campbell.” In pretentious, sophisticated, highly-educated Silicon Valley, the sixth-graders that my wife teaches call her “Stupid,” “Dumbo,” and a “Crack Whore.” When asked to remove their hoods in class, they say, “Why don’t you make me?” It’s obvious when those manners carry over into their online lives.

I’m tired of the pretense. I’m tired of the holier-than-thou attitudes, the disrespectful, hateful “conversations.” I’m tired of trying to walk a middle group, trying to get people to see each other’s points of view. I’m just tired.

I don’t want to cut all ties with my friends. I want to hear about Akiva & Rochelle’s next baby; I want to find out what’s going to happen with Scott and Mary Carmen; I want to hear the next tune from Josh Haley, and I want to see if Marissa makes better decisions than my son, who’s also a freshman in college. But you’ll forgive me, I hope, if I don’t hang out there much any more.

Maybe someday I’ll return, but right now it’s not the sort of place I want to be associated with.

More Blog. Less Tweet.

December 29th, 2009

Akiva has been badgered by Louis to blog more, tweet less. As he so eloquently puts it:

I am arguably the greatest writer of our (or any) generation. So much potential confounded by so much apathy, laziness, and lack of time management skills.

I, too, suffer from the same motivational discord when it comes to blogging (though not from the apparent overconfidence). I have tried, in the past, to force myself to write daily, with often disastrous consequences. Those posts were trite, meaningless, and ultimately forgettable (though, thanks to the long-term memory of the Internet, they will hang around my neck forever like the hickeys of a long-forgotten fling).

» Read more: More Blog. Less Tweet.

New media, new ethics?

November 22nd, 2009

Blogger in PJ's by Flickr user Lola_MayDave Winer has a spot-on post this morning about reporters accepting freebies; that is to say, the ethical implications of reporters who cover Twitter but who receive huge, measurable benefits by being placed on Twitter’s Suggested User List (SUL).

“The New York Times and many other media outlets ban the acceptance of these freebies on ethical grounds, because there could be an appearance of buying favorable coverage.” To me, the free placement on the SUL and the benefits it bestows, are exactly equivalent. Elsewhere in the Times, and in many other media outlets, the number of followers is treated as a measure of relevance.

The issue that Dave explores is just the tip of the iceberg, however. The larger question is how, when large journalistic institutions are fragmenting into ever smaller organizations (often single individuals who run a blog), does a journalist maintain integrity and yet make a living? A solo journalist cannot establish a firewall between the revenue-producing and the editorial sides of the business, for they are both the same. In essence, it means that every individual who blogs alone, and who makes money from her blogging, is at the least tempted or at the worst corrupted by the influence of those who are paying the bills.

» Read more: New media, new ethics?